link rel="alternate" href="https://healthyanoop.com/" hreflang="en-us" / Alexa web rank Buy Website Traffic

interesting Information

Varanasi court docket rejects the Muslim side’s petition: #1 Unique details

Spread the love

Varanasi

Varanasi
Varanasi

Five Hindu ladies had filed a case seeking permission to worship and carry out rituals on the premises of Varanasi’s Gyanvapi mosque. The ownership of the premises has long been disputed — courting returned to 1936

A Varanasi district court has rejected the petition of the Muslim side within the Gyanvapi Masjid case and said that the healthy filed by means of 5 Hindu women in search of worshipping rights within the Gyanvapi Mosque compound is maintainable.

The Gyanvapi Mosque positioned adjoining the Kashi Vishwanath Temple in Varanasi, has been at the centre of a criminal struggle after five ladies petitioners knocked at the doors of the court docket in search of permission to provide prayers at ‘a Shringar Gauri Sthal’ in the complicated, prompting a civil choose to order a videography inspection. The case reached the supreme court docket after the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee (AIMC) moved a plea challenging the survey.

Right here’s a timeline of activities that has led us to nowadays’s development.

1936: The ownership of the Gyanvapi Mosque has continually been up for debate. In 1936, 3 Muslim petitioners had demanded that the whole complicated be declared part of the mosque. It became at some point of this listening that the proper to offer namaz in Gyanvapi changed into granted explicitly including that such prayers may be provided anywhere else inside the complicated. In 1942, the Allahabad excessive courtroom upheld the choice of decreased court docket and brushed off the petition.

1991: the issue first hit right headlines in October 1991 whilst devotees inside the call of the deity ‘Swayambhu Lord Vishweshwar’, claimed that the Gyanvapi mosque changed into built on the site of a temple that became demolished in 1669 on the orders of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. They, therefore, demanded that they ought be allowed to “renovate and reconstruct their temple”.

They argued that the places of Worship (unique Provisions) Act, 1991, didn’t follow the mosque because it was allegedly built on the remnants of the old Visweshwar temple.

1998: The mosque’s control filed a counter-software, annoying the rejection of the match at the floor that it’s far barred by using provisions of the places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.

2019: In December 2019, advise Vijay Shankar Rastogi filed a plea on behalf of Swayambhu Jyotirlinga Bhagwan Vishweshwar in the Varanasi district courtroom. The petitioner demanded that an archaeological survey of the complete Gyanvapi mosque complex must be performed.

He noted that in 1998, it become ordered to collect proof from the whole Gyanvapi complicated in an effort to decide the website’s religious person, but the Allahabad high courtroom postponed the decreased court’s selection.

###################################################################

FOR MORE INTERESTING TOPICS PLEASE CLICK HERE 👇

How to Live a Worry-Free Life
9 ways to attract Good Energy nowadays.
10 Tips for Unleashing Your Full Potential and Achieving Your Dreams

###################################################################

https://www.anoop57.com/2022/02/how-to-live-worry-free-life-in-way-most.html
https://www.anoop57.com/2021/12/9-ways-to-attract-good-energy-nowadays.html
https://healthyanoop.com/goal-10-tips-for-unleashing-your-full-potential-and-achieving-your-dreams/

By the way, this petition became filed just a month after the supreme court’s selection at the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi controversy.

2020: The Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, the mosque’s management, adversarial the petition searching for ASI survey of the entire Gyanvapi complicated. inside the same yr, the petitioner again approached the lower court docket with a petition, asking to renew the listening as the Allahabad excessive courtroom had now not prolonged the stay further.

2021: In April 2021, the Varanasi court ordered the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to behaviour the survey and put up its findings. The Uttar Pradesh Sunni principal Waqf Board and the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee adversarial Rastogi’s plea and the Varanasi courtroom’s choice for a survey of the mosque.

The case turned into eventually heard by way of the Allahabad high court docket, which granted an interim stay at the training to the ASI to perform the survey after hearing all events involved.

18 April 2021: The present-day case is touching on a lawsuit filed with the aid of Rakhi Singh, Laxmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas, and Rekha Pathak. They sought permission to worship and perform rituals at Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesh, Lord Hanuman, and Nandi on an each-day foundation, in addition to preventing fighters from negative the statues in the disputed Gyanvapi premises.

26 April 2022: hearing the case of the five girls, the court of Civil Judge (Senior department) of Varanasi, Ravi Kumar Diwakar, ordered videography of the Shringar Gauri temple within the Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi complex and adjoining places.

6 may also 2022: The survey starts but stops halfway after a team of lawyers is denied access to the mosque.

12 may also 2022: The Varanasi court said that the survey would keep and asked whether or not it’s completed and a report is submitted by means of 17 May additionally. according to the petitioners’ side, a Shivling was found after water turned into tired out of a pond inside the complicated. The Varanasi district court ultimately ordered the district magistrate to seal the region where the Shivling had allegedly been determined and prohibited the access of any man or woman to the vicinity.

21 July: Justice DY Chandrachud of the superb court said that the court shall look ahead to the approaching choice of the Varanasi District and decide on an application filed via Anjuman Intejamia Masjid, challenging the suit filed by means of 5 girl petitioners looking for ‘darshan’ at Gyanvapi Mosque complex.

Justice Chandrachud stated that if the court docket ruled in the favour of Anjuman Intejamia Masjid, the shape undertaken by way of the ladies would organically ‘fall’ and if they dominated in favour of the plaintiff, then the caretakers may want to pursue other judicial redressal.

24 August: District judge A ok Vishvesh reserved his order till 12 September within the remember after both facets concluded their arguments. propose Shamim Ahmad, who represented the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee in the case, stated the Gyanvapi mosque is a Waqf asset and the court does now not have the proper to listen to the problem. It becomes argued that best the Waqf Board has the proper to hear any be counted bearing on the mosque.

12 September: A single-choose bench of district choose AK Vishvesh disregarded the task via the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee against the civil suits that challenged the identity of the Gyanvapi mosque and the land surrounding it.

This means that the civil suits can be heard in element and an exam of proof will observe.

The following hearing has been scheduled for 22 September.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *